A lot of major news outlets are staying away from this story. I don't know if you've noticed it. I did. Yes, it's not accidental. The selective coverage is a form of opposition when thousands of Africans flood the streets to defend their sovereignty against Western meddling, supporting a young military leader who's challenging neocolonial power. They don't think that's new is worthy. And that's proof that these media do control the narratives. They don't just report events, they curate the events. They decide what should get amplified, decide what should be suppressed. But they forget that social media is the new media, so the people are much more aware. Yeah, imagine a leader like Drori. He's expelling French troops, he's reclaiming gold mines, is aligning with Russia instead of native Africans rallying around him. Yes, I would. They want to talk about him positively. All we see are stories of human rights abuse, etc. But this is not making news. You're supposed to just cover the story. Why he's doing is disrupting the traditional narrative that Africa must be led by Western approved. I am EDT deployed pendant people. So instead of join Marchena mass support that, choosing to just focus on the negatives. What is a new day ? Africans ? Oh, a week. Absolutely. And I think This is a unifying factor. I think we've always been operating in silos and this seems to be one of those topics that are now bringing folks together. You mentioned that the news outlets are not reporting this, but you guys have to see this sheer size of some of these protests. If there was protest around anything else, it would be covered by all the major news outlets share, Believe Inspire blacks be.