Lobbyed tobacco companies in Africa opposed the rules which were laws in the UK.
Butter Smoothies? How British American Tobacco Lobbied Against Rules in Africa That Are Law in the UKIn a highly controversial turn of events, British American Tobacco (BAT), one of the largest tobacco companies in the world, has claimed to have pushed Zambian ministers to drop or delay ad bans on flavoured products. BAT claimed that it was working against UK regulations while the company is legally responsible for ensuring compliance with international trade rules.
The letter published by BAT claims that its actions were a "violation" of the principles and requirements of the U.S. World Trade Organization (WTO). It argues that the company had been attempting to push Zambian ministers to drop or delay ad bans on flavoured products in order to avoid controversy and reduce public backlash. However, this claim has gone against widespread international law and transparency.
The letter highlights how BAT tried to avoid direct opposition by focusing its efforts on distractions such as health warnings and restrictions on flavoured products. The company claimed that these were not violating UK regulations but instead were attempting to avoid controversy and protect the company's image. BAT suggested that such actions "failed the public interest" and that it was "more about avoiding public backlash than ensuring compliance with international trade rules."
The article is a wake-up call for many stakeholders in Africa, including Zambian ministers, as it exposes how companies can use politics to push policies that harm their local communities. BAT's attempt to comply with international standards while pushing Zambian officials toward compliance has created both public and private backlash.
The letter was published online by BAT, and some officials have reportedly rejected it, calling it "just another campaign against US sanctions." Others argue that BAT's actions are a sign of its growing connection with local communities and a lack of ethical oversight. The letter serves as a reminder that companies must act with transparency and accountability in their dealings with foreign governments.
In Zambia, the government's reaction has been mixed. Some officials have reportedly pressured BAT to delay or drop ad bans on flavoured products due to concerns over public backlash. Others have suggested that BAT should be investigated for potential violations of international trade rules.
The letter serves as a clear reminder of the hypocrisy that exists when companies prioritize their own interests over those of their local communities. It also highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability in the fight against human rights abuses by global corporations like BAT.
In conclusion, BAT's push to comply with UK regulations while pushing Zambian ministers toward compliance has created significant challenges for the company and its local community. While BAT has acknowledged this issue and is making efforts to address it, some argue that more needs to be done to ensure transparency and accountability in such matters.
------
#Globaldevelopment #Zambia #Globalhealth #BritishAmericanTobacco #Tobaccoindustry #Business #Africa #Worldnews
