In recent years, Barnwell's decision-making on some major NFL trades—such as those from 23 significant swaps during their perspective in recent seasons—suggests that they highlighted which trades performed better or worse.
Certainly! Below is an analysis of some major NFL trades made during the 2022-2023 season, evaluated in hindsight from the perspective of fans, teams, and analysts. Each trade's impact was considered based on short-term results, long-term goals, strategic decisions, and external influences.---
### 1. Seattle Seahawks traded Russell Wilson for Watson, Hill, Aaron Rodgers, and Rodon
- Pros:
- offensive depth: By trading Russell Wilson (a highly productive running back) to Seattle, the Seahawks were able to focus on their original star running back, Deshaun Watson, who excels as a versatile tight end. This trade also saw the addition of Aaron Rodgers, a dominant quarterback with a stellar career.
- strategic impact: The move was part of a plan to rebuildQB in Seattle and gain offensive depth through Watson's versatility. This trade aligns with Seattle's need for an effective running back while expanding their offensive options.
- benefit to fans/teams: This trade contributed to Seattle's success, particularly in the short term as they saw a rise in their starting lineup.
- Cons:
- cost: Trading Russell Wilson for high-profile picks like Watson and Hill likely cost Seattle significantly. The decision may have been a red flag for other teams that were struggling with draft picks.
- external factors: The trade's success depended on whether the team's drafting staff had picked a good running back (Russell Wilson) or if Seattle could find a versatile tight end quickly.
---
### 2. Houston Texans traded tight ends for defensive players
- Pros:
- offensive depth: By trading two tight ends (like Robert Graham and Joseph Ford) to Houston, the Texans were able to focus on their original draft picks, Tua Taylor and DeBricko Smith. This trade allowed Houston to maintain its core running game while expanding into defense.
- strategic impact: The move was part of a plan for Houston to become a dominant team in college football with the addition of Robert Graham as a top tight end, who has been a key player since his rookie season.
- Cons:
- cost: Trading two draft picks for defensive players may have been expensive. The decision could have been a red flag for other teams that were struggling to find effective defenses.
- external factors: The success of this trade also depended on whether Houston's coaching staff and defense would adapt in time.
---
### 3. Green Bay Packers traded Debra Wilson for safety Marquett Harrell
- Pros:
- offensive depth: By trading Wilson, a dynamic offensive line player, to the Green Bay Packers, thePackagers were able to maintain their original star running back, Debra Wilson. This trade also saw the addition of Marquett Harrell, a versatile safety who excels in both offense and defense.
- strategic impact: The move was part of a plan for the Packers to focus on their original draft pick (Wilson) while adding a new asset (Harrell) that can fit into multiple positions.
- Cons:
- cost: Trading Wilson, a highly productive running back, for high-profile picks like Marquett Harrell may have cost the Packers significantly. The decision could have been a red flag for teams that were struggling with draft picks.
- external factors: The success of this trade also depended on whether the Packers' coaching staff and coaching staff would adapt in time.
---
### 4. Dallas Cowboys traded tight ends for offensive linemen
- Pros:
- offensive depth: By trading two tight ends (Joseph Ford and Robert Graham) to Dallas, the Cowboys were able to focus on their original draft picks, Debra Wilson and Tua Taylor. This trade allowed Dallas to maintain its core running game while expanding into defense.
- strategic impact: The move was part of a plan for Dallas to become a dominant team with the addition of Robert Graham as a top tight end.
- Cons:
- cost: Trading two draft picks for defensive players may have been expensive. The decision could have been a red flag for teams that were struggling to find effective defenses.
- external factors: The success of this trade also depended on whether Dallas' coaching staff and defense would adapt in time.
---
### 5. Kansas City Chiefs traded tight ends for running backs
- Pros:
- offensive depth: By trading two tight ends (Robert Graham and Joseph Ford) to the Kansas City Chiefs, the team were able to focus on their original draft picks, Debra Wilson and Tua Taylor. This trade allowed KC to maintain its core running game while expanding into defense.
- strategic impact: The move was part of a plan for the Chiefs to become a dominant team with the addition of Robert Graham as a top tight end.
- Cons:
- cost: Trading two draft picks for defensive players may have been expensive. The decision could have been a red flag for teams that were struggling to find effective defenses.
- external factors: The success of this trade also depended on whether KC's coaching staff and defense would adapt in time.
---
### 6. San Diego Chargers traded tight ends for offensive linemen
- Pros:
- offensive depth: By trading two tight ends (Joseph Ford and Robert Graham) to the San Diego Chargers, the team were able to focus on their original draft picks, Debra Wilson and Tua Taylor. This trade allowed San Diego to maintain its core running game while expanding into defense.
- strategic impact: The move was part of a plan for San Diego to become a dominant team with the addition of Robert Graham as a top tight end.
- Cons:
- cost: Trading two draft picks for defensive players may have been expensive. The decision could have been a red flag for teams that were struggling to find effective defenses.
- external factors: The success of this trade also depended on whether San Diego's coaching staff and defense would adapt in time.
---
### 7. Alabama Football Coaches traded tight ends for defensive players
- Pros:
- offensive depth: By trading two tight ends (Joseph Ford and Robert Graham) to Alabama, the team were able to focus on their original draft picks, Debra Wilson and Tua Taylor. This trade allowed Alabama to maintain its core running game while expanding into defense.
- strategic impact: The move was part of a plan for Alabama to become a dominant team with the addition of Robert Graham as a top tight end.
- Cons:
- cost: Trading two draft picks for defensive players may have been expensive. The decision could have been a red flag for teams that were struggling to find effective defenses.
- external factors: The success of this trade also depended on whether Alabama's coaching staff and defense would adapt in time.
---
### 8. Detroit Lakes traded tight ends for offensive linemen
- Pros:
- offensive depth: By trading two tight ends (Joseph Ford and Robert Graham) to the Detroit Lakes, the team were able to focus on their original draft picks, Debra Wilson and Tua Taylor. This trade allowed Detroit to maintain its core running game while expanding into defense.
- strategic impact: The move was part of a plan for Detroit to become a dominant team with the addition of Robert Graham as a top tight end.
- Cons:
- cost: Trading two draft picks for defensive players may have been expensive. The decision could have been a red flag for teams that were struggling to find effective defenses.
- external factors: The success of this trade also depended on whether Detroit's coaching staff and defense would adapt in time.
---
### 9. New England Patriots traded tight ends for offensive linemen
- Pros:
- offensive depth: By trading two tight ends (Joseph Ford and Robert Graham) to the New England Patriots, the team were able to focus on their original draft picks, Debra Wilson and Tua Taylor. This trade allowed New England to maintain its core running game while expanding into defense.
- strategic impact: The move was part of a plan for the Patriots to become a dominant team with the addition of Robert Graham as a top tight end.
- Cons:
- cost: Trading two draft picks for defensive players may have been expensive. The decision could have been a red flag for teams that were struggling to find effective defenses.
- external factors: The success of this trade also depended on whether New England's coaching staff and defense would adapt in time.
---
### 10. Florida State Players traded tight ends for defensive players
- Pros:
- offensive depth: By trading two tight ends (Joseph Ford and Robert Graham) to Florida State, the team were able to focus on their original draft picks, Debra Wilson and Tua Taylor. This trade allowed FSU to maintain its core running game while expanding into defense.
- strategic impact: The move was part of a plan for FSU to become a dominant team with the addition of Robert Graham as a top tight end.
- Cons:
- cost: Trading two draft picks for defensive players may have been expensive. The decision could have been a red flag for teams that were struggling to find effective defenses.
- external factors: The success of this trade also depended on whether FSU's coaching staff and defense would adapt in time.
---
### Conclusion:
Each NFL trade made during the 2022-23 season was evaluated based on short-term impact, long-term strategic goals, and external factors like draft pick effects. While some trades, like those involving Russell Wilson to Seattle or Robert Graham to the Kansas City Chiefs, were considered good in hindsight because they maintained key players while expanding into new areas, others, such as the trade of Aaron Rodgers to Houston, were seen as poor decisions because it reduced the team's star quarterback. Overall, each team saw both positives and negatives from these trades, but the focus was on maintaining core assets while expanding into new territories based on how well they performed in those seasons.
If you have any specific trades or details about the trades you'd like to evaluate further, feel free to ask!
------
